Back

 Fisher Photography - Previously VP_S_Wagon  

Page 11 of 30
Jump to page
Post Topic
DR1F7
Post #361

He is a WA resident.

silver styler
Post #362

oh ok sorry.

what camera do you use? or recomend?

DR1F7
Post #363

Nikon D80 he uses, and he I bet he will recommend the D200.

vp_s_wagon
Post #364

Lance,
I still have a D50, D80 comes at the end of October. Can't Wait to get it!

Nova,
I recomend a D50 or D80, both are great!

Harry

`Nova
Post #365

ahh harry? i have a d70s.. and wouldn't trade it (unless it was a d200)

think you mean silver styler tongue.gif
vp_s_wagon
Post #366

QUOTE(`Nova @ Sep 15 2006, 09:31 PM) [snapback]1280254359[/snapback]

ahh harry? i have a d70s.. and wouldn't trade it (unless it was a d200)

think you mean silver styler tongue.gif


Yeh I meant for Silver Styler, not you mate:) The D70s is great.

`Nova
Post #367

yeah its a pitty i got it at the end of its line.. but you're right.. the d50 and the up and coming d80 are going to be tops!!

Ronza
Post #368

Some pretty nice new additions Harry, did one of my shots last month inspire ya? laugh.gif

The fisheye effect is great especially if you can't go wide enough, unfortunately the image quality seems to degrade when you've thrown the adapter on. You seem to use the effect well though, I've had a quick play with a mates 10.5 fish on the D2x - very cool stuff, its a crying shame Canon don't offer a lens like that.

The light painting doesn't do much for me, the scene is relatively interesting and the flashes don't add meaning or interest to the scene IMO. Your multiple silhouettes look like the by product of light painting, a single silhouette would work better.

vp_s_wagon
Post #369

Thanks heaps for that feedback Ronza,
When u refer to the painting with light, do u mean the sillhouettes or the other stuff I did before?
I'll try some with single or no sillhouettes.
Yeh that fisheye is pretty crappy quality, but the images I am doing with it are not supposed to be high detail so I'm not too fussed. I am going to buy a decent fisheye soon, like this one: http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_al...amp;navigator=4
which is also made with a canon mount.

Harry

Ronza
Post #370

Oh, I was referring to the shots in the first post of this page (the graffed tanks).

Nickle
Post #371

QUOTE
Nickle,
HAPPY BIRTHDAY!
It is great fun using the fisheye. Come and try it out some time soon.
I had never thought of that with the un-cropped. i agree. I think I am going to keep it like that.
Thanks Heaps.


I'm glad my feedback came in handy! and thanks for the birthday message. Can't wait to c more of ur stuff. You find so many random places considering... well.. we're in Perth. Haha I suppose its the benefits of having a car.

vp_s_wagon
Post #372

QUOTE(Ronza @ Sep 17 2006, 09:57 AM) [snapback]1280256672[/snapback]

Oh, I was referring to the shots in the first post of this page (the graffed tanks).


Oh ok. So by Painting with light u mean the flash around the sillhouette? How do u think I should get the sillhouette (just one not 3) then? Or do u think I should just ditch them and take the photo just of the tank with the graffiti?

Harry

vp_s_wagon
Post #373

I did another one of My Big ole' Pano's, what do u think??

I know it's similar to the other one but it's heaps better quality when u zoom in on the full-res version, and it's also with a blue sky this time.


Harry

53XEH
Post #374

i could see that shot working really well just on sunset/sunrise

still good tho thumbsup.gif

vp_s_wagon
Post #375

QUOTE(53XEH @ Sep 19 2006, 11:09 PM) [snapback]1280268181[/snapback]

i could see that shot working really well just on sunset/sunrise

still good tho thumbsup.gif


Yeh, I should try it then. Not sure what it would look like though, it is about 10km inland (remember where the sunset is over here).

`Nova
Post #376

fantastic shot again harry.. theres some point in the shot where it turns from a blue sky.. to a slightly green sky.. but the whole thing really works for me biggrin.gif

what settings were you using?

vp_s_wagon
Post #377

Cheers Mate,
F.9, 30 sec exposure, ISO 200 @ 24mm on my 18-55mm standard lens

puzzle man
Post #378

QUOTE(vp_s_wagon @ Sep 20 2006, 12:48 AM) [snapback]1280268145[/snapback]

I did another one of My Big ole' Pano's, what do u think??

I know it's similar to the other one but it's heaps better quality when u zoom in on the full-res version, and it's also with a blue sky this time.


Harry

nice pic Harry
i got ArcSoft Panorama Maker 3 it pretty good but i have no pic yet.

Nickle
Post #379

Nice quality Fish.
I like the blue sky more than the orange ones from before. It's more like the real thing.

And i think if it were right on sunset the sun would be too far to the right? Is that true? It would probably be a lot harder to stitch with that much small detail too...

Nic

DR1F7
Post #380

I can see a stitch mark tongue.gif

Do you do your pano's in Manual, or do you use AE Lock on your camera?

Ghetto Panda
Post #381

I've really gotta give a pano a go one day i always want too but never end up doing it.
Great pano btw

vp_s_wagon
Post #382

Puzzle Man,
Let me know if it is any Good because my lag with a 15,000x1,900 pixel image in RAW on photoshop is something chronic!! Especially considering I use a laptop.
To give you some idea of the resolution I am working with, This is the shed on the very right-hand side, in full-res:

Nickle,
Yeh I'm liking the blue. The orange sky in the other one was not photoshopped, it was actually like that, it's just the suburban lights, lighting up the clouds.
I'm not sure about sunset. Worth a shot though.

Lance,
Where?? I'll get rid of the bastard!
I use full manual, that way u get the same settings in all ur shots and they match up better.

Ghetto,
Cheers mate, they are pretty easy to take, it's the stitching that sucks.

Cheers for the feedback,
Harry
Nickle
Post #383

That shed looks awesome even by itself. The trees look great behind it too smile.gif That's gotta be tough work Harold

fltsteward
Post #384

Great shots... Keep going, it looks like you have a real enthusiasm for your work. Im sure with time and experience you will get even better.

vp_s_wagon
Post #385

Long time no photo.
I went out tonight and decided to try something a little different. Something a bit 'old school' or at least that is what i was trying for.
What do u guys recon?

Non Old-School:
1. 2.

Old-School:
3. 4.

Harry

Moment
Post #386

Number 3 probably has teh best feeling about it. Its just a good angle, but no offence, there isn't really anything special about these pictures. Im sure you know what i mean with that.

vp_s_wagon
Post #387

QUOTE(Moment @ Sep 26 2006, 07:14 AM) [snapback]1280287493[/snapback]

Number 3 probably has teh best feeling about it. Its just a good angle, but no offence, there isn't really anything special about these pictures. Im sure you know what i mean with that.


Yeh I agree, I just needed to get out and take some. Helps me relax during exams.

Moment
Post #388

i told you another quick fix for that last night mate wink.gif

Nickle
Post #389

Amen to that Harry! Helps get ur mind off it smile.gif
Nice shots. I like the third one too but the light pole right in the middle is a bit distracting.
(in the second one, meow is written on the wall hahaha!)

And err, Matt, care to share on the quick fix???
... sounds kinky

vp_s_wagon
Post #390

QUOTE(Nickle @ Sep 26 2006, 01:50 PM) [snapback]1280289278[/snapback]

... sounds kinky

Oh it is and it involves u!
Yeh that pole is a bugger but I had to have it because it gives me the lighting and the tint that I want for that shot. I will fuck it up if i try and take it out in photoshop so I wont bother with that.
lol, I didn't even notice that meow!

Harry

Nickle
Post #391

QUOTE(vp_s_wagon @ Sep 26 2006, 04:00 PM) [snapback]1280289340[/snapback]

Oh it is and it involves u!
Yeh that pole is a bugger but I had to have it because it gives me the lighting and the tint that I want for that shot. I will fuck it up if i try and take it out in photoshop so I wont bother with that.
lol, I didn't even notice that meow!

Harry


Oh really dry.gif how excitement
Lol and seriously. Do you expect me not to notice something saying meow?

Rainey
Post #392

Harry, I agree No. 3 works well too. I almost think that the pole adds some character to the image, picturing it gone would make the image very plain.

Nickle
Post #393

I agree the pole should be in the shot... just not positioned right there.
smile.gif Much character, very noice and unuuuusual...

vp_s_wagon
Post #394

QUOTE(Nickle @ Sep 26 2006, 02:15 PM) [snapback]1280289410[/snapback]

I agree the pole should be in the shot... just not positioned right there.
smile.gif Much character, very noice and unuuuusual...


Yeh it does cut it in half a bit doesn't it. But I agree that it wouldn't look as good without it.

MTB.GTR
Post #395

thay look nice

  • Member Login

    If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.

    Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.

    If you don't have an account create one below.

    Create Account
  • Forgotten your password?
  • Login with Facebook

    Login using your Facebook account!

Page 11 of 30
Jump to page
THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN ARCHIVED
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Loading...
x