LRP -> high octane ULP?  

Page 2 of 2
Jump to page
March_Hare
Post #36

Timing is measured in rich and lean hey, well i dont agree with that. I was taught it is retard and advance because you are doing exactly that, changing the ignition timing. I dont have to tell you what you are essentially doing is delaying or advancing the pulse. If you start to associate ignition timing with fuel mixtures it is very easy to become confused and for the average person to think they are infact chaning the fuel mixture.



I never said that pinging couldnt be caused by anything else, what i said was when dropping to a lower octane rating it is better to play it by ear. The drop in octane level does not automatically mean the engine is going to suffer from pinging, in this case where the octane rating has been dropped, it is totally dependant on compression ratios. If on the other hand the engine was suffering from pinging before the change in fuels, i would still have suggested the same course of action, and once the change over occured then the pinging can be dealt with. So in the case i was stating with the drop in octane, it is directly proportional to compression ratio.



VSR and LRP are directly linked. If it wasnt such a problem why would fuel companies, engine reconditioners and manufacturers be issuing warnings?



As for what you were taught about lead, the early fuels were unleaded and had a higher octane rating than the hybrids to follow it. TEL was added to the fuel because quite simply the soft metal was being destroyed under the operating conditions (as i listed above in a brief explaination on VSR). In the past year i can name 7 vehicles in my area that have had guides and seats fail that can be directly attributed to LRP. I dont even know of a local mechanic that reccomends the use of LRP because it is a proven fact that it does cause damage. LRP was meant to be a temporary fix, it was never meant to replace leaded fuels in the long run. It was only during the phase out process it was realised the impact on vehicle numbers running Leaded fuels would be minimal. Therefore the added expense of developing another alternative would be far greater than the returns. If your one for conspiracy theories you could say the big fuel giants were in bed with car companies in an effort to get older vehicles off the road and customers buying replacement models. I of course think that it doesnt hold any merrit.



Anything else you wish to discuss? Would you like me to provide tech docs to support my claims on VSR in another thread?



If iam wrong i will appologise, there have been quite a few threads on another forum dealing with this topic and it is still fresh in my head.

March_Hare
Post #37

[quote="Bevan Boy"]

QUOTE


yeah not sure about the head

couldnt ge onto the guy either

flow 410hp and i have an edelbrock manifold and 750 Holley carb and massive cam but that doesnt help u much

so if i dont run UCL with it what can happen?




Chances are you are probably right to go with just running Unleaded (in terms of potential damage caused). If you are unsure, running UCL isnt going to cause any harm, it may just give you peace of mind. The other possible alternative is to look for any cast marks to designate any change of design of the head itself. Any reference number may be handy to trace back between revisions and alterations. Still try to get a hold of the bloke who did the rebuild, if he did the work himself he will be full of knowledge that you can carry over to the engine in your vehicle. If he didnt do the work, he should be able to tell you the name of the rebuilder who did. Quite often they dont mind a chat, maybe shout him a drink or two biggrin.gif

blown13b
Post #38

i wasnt the one saying timing was measured in rich and lean!!! you were but anyway i am sick of fighting about it!!!

March_Hare
Post #39

I must appologise, i missed out causing.

FIDDY
Post #40

ohhhh i didnt no dat, i thought all premium was 98

ASH81x
Post #41

QUOTE
if anyone really cares.. i looked up the octane of shell and bp fuels awhile ago.. and im sure the only thing that has changed is that BP has gotten rid of premium unleaded and replaced it with ultimate in all the pump stations now.



now i could be wrong.. but generally.. these are the octane ratings of fuel



UNLEADED                    95 octane

Super / LRP                   96 octane

Premium Unleaded         96 octane  (discontinued at some stations)

OPTIMAX / Ultimate        98 octane



Aparrently optimax and ultimate have some extra additives to keep your engine running better.. but i doubt it.. sounds like sales propaganda to me.



i used to only run optimax and i used to go out of my way to get it.. because it was the only fuel nearby that had 98 octane rating.. now that bp has one, I go where ever the price is cheaper.



Cheers



Jamoise






Hmm i always thought normal unleaded was 93 octane and LRP/Premium was 95?

cams116
Post #42

I dont know what we are complaining about, the US their normal unleaded is 89 octane, and they reckon some dodgy places go as low as 86 octane. They dont really have a 98octane pump fuel.

March_Hare
Post #43

ULP 91min

LRP - 96min

PULP -95min

Super PULP 98min.

BP sell av gas for road use (ie not aircraft use) which is 110 if i can remember. Laws have been passed finally giving a minimum manufactured rating.



Yeah cams, the states is about the only country in the world with shittier fuel than ours biggrin.gif Now you know why they are fans of big 90 degree 8's and buick 6's tongue.gif

JJRB30ET
Post #44

Using ULP in my 308 torana, was good for a while (ie a couple of years), but now funnily enough i have very noticable exhaust valve leaks, and i'm sure the intake wouldnt be sealing properly either (has a cch288 cam, so the intake valves are pretty much open all the time) it all depends on what car. YES lead does soften the blow of the valves onto their seats, and because i have been running optimax since its conception, it has now FUCKED IT!! (ps the engine has only done 8000km since rebuilt which included a 3 angle valve seat job!!!)



so maybe in rotarys its fine (no valves let alone valve seats!!!) but i wouldnt be giving the advice that it is fine to use to anyone. i'm sure i wouldnt be to happy fucking a cylinder head because i listened to some guy on a forum..but since it takes a LONG TIME to slowly damage valve seats, they would have forgotten who told them anyway.....



Hey does anyone care that this car wouldnt have a catalytic converter!! IE its illegal to use the fuel without it. let alone the fact that without it the car is emmitiing carcinegenic Benzene rings.. cool, yeh your car might do a 20.1 second quarter as opposed to a 20.2, but youll grow another head!!!!!

Bevan Boy
Post #45

[quote="March_Hare"]

QUOTE
QUOTE


yeah not sure about the head

couldnt ge onto the guy either

flow 410hp and i have an edelbrock manifold and 750 Holley carb and massive cam but that doesnt help u much

so if i dont run UCL with it what can happen?




Chances are you are probably right to go with just running Unleaded (in terms of potential damage caused). If you are unsure, running UCL isnt going to cause any harm, it may just give you peace of mind. The other possible alternative is to look for any cast marks to designate any change of design of the head itself. Any reference number may be handy to trace back between revisions and alterations. Still try to get a hold of the bloke who did the rebuild, if he did the work himself he will be full of knowledge that you can carry over to the engine in your vehicle. If he didnt do the work, he should be able to tell you the name of the rebuilder who did. Quite often they dont mind a chat, maybe shout him a drink or two biggrin.gif




Cheers

Spoke to the guy

didnt no much about the head but when i asked about fuel he said he changed the valve stems and seals so that it could run on unleaded

March_Hare
Post #46

changed the stems? Sounds like he knows even less than you think. Seals arent anything to worry about. Did you mean something else?

March_Hare
Post #47

QUOTE
i wouldnt be giving the advice that it is fine to use to anyone. i'm sure i wouldnt be to happy fucking a cylinder head because i listened to some guy on a forum..but since it takes a LONG TIME to slowly damage valve seats, they would have forgotten who told them anyway.....





There have been cases of significant damage being caused within 20,000k's.

Drew82
Post #48

i just switch from LRP about 6 months ago.. we took my heads off and the LRP had left an orange colour build up in my heads etc etc, now my mechanic said to run premium with flash lube and... wow, no more orange shit and the car runs nice and crispy now i advise premium with flash lube to any one thinking about it

Bevan Boy
Post #49

QUOTE
changed the stems? Sounds like he knows even less than you think. Seals arent anything to worry about. Did you mean something else?




nah i'm pretty sure thats what he said?

i'm getting the feeling i've been bent over :oops:

the red krawler
Post #50

I just run LRP in Brutis2, if you are so worried about going faster that a +2 RON rating makes you hard in the pants, I suggest you get a real car wink.gif

sik_EBIIghia
Post #51

QUOTE
ummm i dont think you read my post properly!!! tell me why you think that the valve seat lube is required on some cars??? the lube is suposible there to stop valve seat recession. BUT you only need to use that if your not going to use LEAD REPLACEMENT PETROL right? WRONG!!!

as i said lead was never put in fuel to do this. it was added to raise the octane level. so why would you suddenly have to put this shit in? Unleaded is the same but uses BENZINE instead of LEAD to raise the octane level. END CLASS 101




u no why u need valve seat lube on a leaded car running unleaded its because leaded cars have soft valve seats unleaded cars have hard valve seats the lead acts as a lubricant as well as having other properties such as raising the octane level benzine is shit and doesn't do what lead used to do anywhere near as well, so if u wanna run unleaded in ur leaded car (with soft valve seats) without valve lube say bye bye to your valve seats after a while

where are u pulling this bullshit dude???

lead replcement fuel is shit also, don't be a tight ass use some valve lube costs like $2 extra per tank + ultimate ur car will run sweet

sik_EBIIghia
Post #52

i'm running BP ultimate + valve lube, in the mk1 capri with no catalytic converter, its legal and it runs fine have had no probs with the valve seats and it runs slightly hotter than it did when u could buy leaded, i'm thinking of running avgas only, damn fuel company's bring back 110 octane leaded like what the car ran back in the 70's damn it



it just goes to show how some people think they no everything when they really don't have a clue there is so much wrong information in this thread and only a small amount of correct info

*looks at blown 13b*

March_Hare
Post #53

You can no longer buy avgas for commercial use. It is usually packaged in 20L or 205L drums and contains a high lead content fuel with a high octane for high performance engines with high compression ratios and for vintage or classic cars, which like the low volatility. It is illegal to use "Avgas" in vehicles on public highways. It is sold in drums for use at racetracks and off road racing events approved by one of the following organisations: Confederation of Australian Motor Sport (cams), National association of Speedway Racing ,Australian National Drag Racing Association, Australian Karting Association or Motorcycling Australia.



So unless your a member of either of the above associations, your chances of getting any "Avgas" is pretty remote. sad.gif

blown13b
Post #54

fuck sik_EBIIghia sorry i made a mistake but i still stick with my beliefs on the whole VSR thing because i can honestly not recall seeing it on the motors we did!!! but man we all make mistakes look at you for instance you bought a ford falcon!!!! that was my opinion be it right or wrong!!!

sik_EBIIghia
Post #55

mach_hare i know this allready smile.gif

and blown13b settle down its the internet for fucks sake,

there was alot of other incorrect posts too not just yours



it shows lack of brain power when it comes down to people using what car another person drives as an attempted insult, lame dude at least think of a better comeback

btw i dun own a falcon, i drive a 1970 capri GT and i used to own a fairmont ghia but it got stolen

March_Hare
Post #56

I was just replying about it because i have 74L left and i cant get any more till another meeting sad.gif Loaded up the tank before i left, put the car on a trailer and went home biggrin.gif



As for your capri, you need a Mk III with a 302w mate laugh.gif

Bevan Boy
Post #57

isnt that capri ur sisters ?? biggrin.gif

sorry dude just joking!

rescetp to the capri! nice car those!

u have pics??

cams116
Post #58

QUOTE
isnt that capri ur sisters ??  :D

sorry dude just joking!

rescetp to the capri! nice car those!

u have pics??




[img]https://www.boostcruising.com/journal/files/JuStDaVe200302161823journalfile9.jpg[/img]



Its pretty quick too, I have seen it beat a R32 GTSt, not bad for a 30yo V6. smile.gif

Bevan Boy
Post #59

sweeet

yeah that is no suprise

those v6's were a great package!

as soon as i get my radiator i am going down the coast for this sunday arvo cruise!

  • Member Login

    If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.

    Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.

    If you don't have an account create one below.

    Create Account
  • Login with Facebook

    Login using your Facebook account!

Page 2 of 2
Jump to page
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Loading...
x