unclepaulie
Post #36
343rwkw stock? ... What is this madness. +1 lol cant complain with that power figure fresh out of the box. surely a flash and extractors would unleash a few more killerwasps. simmons look great but that dollar figure is way too much. could got a set of ccw's or adv1's for similar money |
---|
wolfman101
Post #42
Interesting. |
---|
wolfman101
Post #47
Whoah: mid-11s? |
---|
wolfman101
Post #49
ive heard low 12s my mate ran 12.33 stock as a rock in his f6 and his car had 270rwkw standard so dunno where that puts mine lol? Yep, F6s are well known for out of the box low 12s. The lowest figure I've been able to see reported for a 2011 GT is 12.4x |
---|
wolfman101
Post #62
|
---|
vy57ss
Post #64
all those twelves were probly straight out of the box on street tyres, if the f6s are running 12.3-12.4 stock with 270-280rwkw, im sure these could easily pull a low 12, high 11 with 330-340rwkw. ford forums mention how hard they are to get off the line on street tyres with all the torque, there is a video of one running tens at willowbank. |
---|
wolfman101
Post #65
all those twelves were probly straight out of the box on street tyres, if the f6s are running 12.3-12.4 stock with 270-280rwkw, im sure these could easily pull a low 12, high 11 with 330-340rwkw. ford forums mention how hard they are to get off the line on street tyres with all the torque, there is a video of one running tens at willowbank. Ok, cool. I'm talking stock, and to me that includes street legal tyres. So does anyone have a link to a slip or video showing lower than 12.4? I'm not calling bullshit, I genuinely want to know. If so, then that's faster than the F6 310, which I've seen run 12.2x bone stock...and I think that's the fastest sub 100k car I know of. May have a new winner here! |
---|
Wraith
Post #66
Ok, cool. I'm talking stock, and to me that includes street legal tyres. So does anyone have a link to a slip or video showing lower than 12.4? I'm not calling bullshit, I genuinely want to know. If so, then that's faster than the F6 310, which I've seen run 12.2x bone stock...and I think that's the fastest sub 100k car I know of. May have a new winner here! I have been looking and I swear when they first came out I read an article and some one ran a high 11 out of the box. Not sure can't seem to find it. Either way it's better bang for your buck then the 6 turbo now. A tune is all that's needed to run mid 11s. |
---|
wolfman101
Post #67
I have been looking and I swear when they first came out I read an article and some one ran a high 11 out of the box. Not sure can't seem to find it. Either way it's better bang for your buck then the 6 turbo now. A tune is all that's needed to run mid 11s. Same diff with the F6, I believe. |
---|
vy57ss
Post #69
Ok, cool. I'm talking stock, and to me that includes street legal tyres. So does anyone have a link to a slip or video showing lower than 12.4? I'm not calling bullshit, I genuinely want to know. If so, then that's faster than the F6 310, which I've seen run 12.2x bone stock...and I think that's the fastest sub 100k car I know of. May have a new winner here! Hunt through the ford forum I could swear I saw one run 12.0 when they tested it, yes hsv really need to pick up there game, down 120-130rwhp on your competitor is embarassing |
---|
If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.
Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.
If you don't have an account create one below.
Create AccountLogin using your Facebook account!