Best P Plate Car?  

Page 2 of 2
Jump to page
E.Honda
Post #36

no not all of them! the do make a gts!

matty95
Post #37

QUOTE (E.Honda @ Nov 12 2010, 09:36 PM) *
no not all of them! the do make a gts!


haha my mistake when i said r32 i meant golf r32 not skyline

32 MKV
Post #38

QUOTE (matty95 @ Nov 12 2010, 08:34 PM) *
how can you drive an r32, arent they turbo?

No they are a 3.2 ltr VR6 N/A.
I get asked often if it's supercharged/Turbo... Nope... Just sweet N/A power :-)

truffles
Post #39

QUOTE (matty95 @ Nov 12 2010, 08:44 PM) *
haha my mistake when i said r32 i meant golf r32 not skyline



What? The r32 golf uses 3.2L 6 cylinder...


Edit: Beaten by about 2 seconds.

iamhappy46
Post #40

QUOTE (matty95 @ Nov 12 2010, 09:34 PM) *
how can you drive an r32, arent they turbo?


Your thinking GTi, the R32 Golf is a AWD 3.2L V6 with 250+Hp

matty95
Post #41

QUOTE (32 MKV @ Nov 12 2010, 10:15 PM) *
No they are a 3.2 ltr VR6 N/A.
I get asked often if it's supercharged/Turbo... Nope... Just sweet N/A power :-)



oh cool, i just assumed that because the gti was turbo the faster r32 would be too

32 MKV
Post #42

QUOTE (iamhappy46 @ Nov 12 2010, 09:15 PM) *
Your thinking GTi, the R32 Golf is a AWD 3.2L V6 with 250+Hp



QUOTE (matty95 @ Nov 12 2010, 09:24 PM) *
oh cool, i just assumed that because the gti was turbo the faster r32 would be too

This is the VR6 in a R32.


 
DAL32
Post #43

QUOTE (matty95 @ Nov 12 2010, 09:24 PM) *
oh cool, i just assumed that because the gti was turbo the faster r32 would be too

Nah they just put a man sized engine in...

Hoybo
Post #44

Wtf do you want from your car?

Straight line, corners, drift, cruiser, other?

I'd recommend a VN for all those options.

wbtonner
Post #45

QUOTE (truffles @ Nov 11 2010, 02:33 PM) *
200kw per tonne rule? What are you on about? Assuming you're in Qld, the 200kw rule is an absolute rule, has nothing to do with vehicle weight.

EDIT: The lotus elise series 2 190 sport only makes 166kw per tonne at the flywheel anyway.


And you certainly seem like you should be in school. This topic has been covered more times that you've had sex. That and the fact the "best" anything is always going to be personal opinion.

I'd have liked a 2 door Lj torana, worked 202, 200+ at the rears. Low 14's high 13's set up right.
Pity they're going up in price way too much.

QUOTE (32 MKV @ Nov 12 2010, 09:42 PM) *
This is the VR6 in a R32.

This is the VR6 in 'my' R32 is what you should have said

KammdUP
Post #46

i heard somthign about vic roads bringing in a 200kw per tonne rule to stop people rocking out in 800kg cars with 150+kw, but i must have bin mistaken, as for best being a personal choice, i was refering to it in technical specifications, not personal opinion, the reason being the freelander is slow, cheaply upholstered and just generally a tacky car (1999 model)

TheGeniusMoose
Post #47

As far as i was aware, its 125kw per tonne down south?

project toneski
Post #48

best p plate car is a manuel commo, check my topics if you want one

scozzy_vk
Post #49

99 magna advance 5 speed man 168 k/w sports suspention from stock handles like crazy they do up real nicely and they flog most commodores lol sound good with exhaust system too best thing when ya get opens and over 25 u can supercharge them easily

truffles
Post #50

QUOTE (KammdUP @ Nov 13 2010, 12:01 PM) *
i heard somthign about vic roads bringing in a 200kw per tonne rule to stop people rocking out in 800kg cars with 150+kw,



That would be a stupid law threshold anyway. You do realise that the only cars that have that power to weight ratio are either very expensive, or supercars in their own right.


I don't think you realise the magnitude of 200kw/tonne.


The ferrari 360 has a kerb weight of 1450kgs and makes 300kw at the flywheel from factory. That's 206.8kw/tonne.


A 2009 Nissan GT-R has a kerb weight of 1748kg and makes 368kw at the flywheel. That's 210kw/tonne.


Do you see where I am going with this? The only cars a P plater couldn't drive under that law are ones 99% of people won't ever be able to afford anyway, let alone p-platers. Even if this was to cover modded p-plater cars, there is no way of testing this. They're not going to give you time on a road side dyno to prove it.


Edit: Yes the technical specs matter, but once again it's personal opinion. It depends what you personally want out of a car. How you want it to handle, shift, brake. It's not as simple as going "this car makes power and weighs fuck all, so it must be the BEST p-plate car"

iamhappy46
Post #51

QUOTE (KammdUP @ Nov 13 2010, 01:01 PM) *
i heard somthign about vic roads bringing in a 200kw per tonne rule to stop people rocking out in 800kg cars with 150+kw, but i must have bin mistaken, as for best being a personal choice, i was refering to it in technical specifications, not personal opinion, the reason being the freelander is slow, cheaply upholstered and just generally a tacky car (1999 model)


Which factory produced car makes 150Kw without being a V8/turbo/supercharged engine in an 800Kg car? There is no need for a 200Kw/tonne rule

QUOTE (TheGeniusMoose @ Nov 13 2010, 01:20 PM) *
As far as i was aware, its 125kw per tonne down south?


On motorbikes, yes.

clutch-monkey
Post #52

in victoria i thought it was the same for cars, i remember discussing with a P plater how a DC5 ITR slipped under the restrictions a few years back?

KammdUP
Post #53

ok my mistake it must have been about the bikes, didnt want it to turn into a shit fight full of technical and legal jargon just wanted peoples opinions, so can we please stick to that

astorey
Post #54

QUOTE (truffles @ Nov 13 2010, 01:10 PM) *
That would be a stupid law threshold anyway. You do realise that the only cars that have that power to weight ratio are either very expensive, or supercars in their own right.


I don't think you realise the magnitude of 200kw/tonne.


The ferrari 360 has a kerb weight of 1450kgs and makes 300kw at the flywheel from factory. That's 206.8kw/tonne.


A 2009 Nissan GT-R has a kerb weight of 1748kg and makes 368kw at the flywheel. That's 210kw/tonne.


Do you see where I am going with this? The only cars a P plater couldn't drive under that law are ones 99% of people won't ever be able to afford anyway, let alone p-platers. Even if this was to cover modded p-plater cars, there is no way of testing this. They're not going to give you time on a road side dyno to prove it.


Edit: Yes the technical specs matter, but once again it's personal opinion. It depends what you personally want out of a car. How you want it to handle, shift, brake. It's not as simple as going "this car makes power and weighs fuck all, so it must be the BEST p-plate car"

I think he mean't to say 100kw/tonne

KammdUP
Post #55

yeh it was ment to be 100kw i didnt realise the mistake till just then

iamhappy46
Post #56

QUOTE (astorey @ Nov 13 2010, 03:08 PM) *
I think he mean't to say 100kw/tonne


That would rule out the EK VTiR Civic... they wont implement that rule ever. Too much variance for it to be inforced.

Hell, it would rule out most V6 Commodores and Falcoons

Zimma
Post #57

QUOTE (clutch-monkey @ Nov 13 2010, 02:26 PM) *
in victoria i thought it was the same for cars, i remember discussing with a P plater how a DC5 ITR slipped under the restrictions a few years back?


Victoria has the same rules as queensland regarding p platers and restrictions minus the 13b rotary one i believe. There's a list of 6 cylinder cars that are banend which are like porsches, nsx, 350/370z but thats about it they ditched the power to weight restriction in favour of a blanket rule about 3 years ago, but even then the power to weight rule had a fair bit of room.

clutch-monkey
Post #58

ah yep would have been that long ago. makes sense now

truffles
Post #59

I think the power to weight ratio has merit..to a point. The lawmakers in QLD are slowly bending their heads around allowing more turbocharged cars on the list for p-platers. I (along with most people who own a brain) think this is a smart idea. Given the prices of fuel, car developers are going for a turbocharged engine to increase fuel econemy whilst retaining the power of a larger capacity engine. They are obviously not designed as high-performance cars. They incorporate all the modern technology and safety features and are more cost effective. An example of said car would have to be a Volkswagen Gofl GTI V. Yes it's 2L turbocharged engine makes 147kw and is therefore illegal under the current law. But it's bigger brother the Golf R32 makes 184kw with it's larger, naturally aspirated engine and yet is P-plate legal. However, if this law change were to happen, it would only allow for a strict and non-performance based number of cars. So no, your skyline/supra/wrx doesn't count.


Something isn't quite right.


Bit O/T from best p-plate cars. But it's always food for thought.

  • Member Login

    If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.

    Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.

    If you don't have an account create one below.

    Create Account
  • Login with Facebook

    Login using your Facebook account!

Page 2 of 2
Jump to page
THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN ARCHIVED
5 User(s) are reading this topic (5 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Loading...
x