#1
11th June 2010 - 06:06 PM
Post |
|
---|---|
There are 3 different power plants: the 1800 GS (125 bhp), the 2 litre V6 GR/GX (170 bhp) and the top of the range 2.0 V6 24v MIVEC GPX/GPR (196 bhp) which has to be one of the best handling front wheel drive coupes available. The gpr is slightly faster is it doesnt have as much luxuries as the gpx, same engine but lightweight model. The gpr is the ultimate fto. In terms of tweak potential the FTO is limited. In the same way as extracting more power from a Suzuki Swift GTi engine is difficult, the 6A12 is a real stubborn thing. The problem (if you can call it that) is that the factory has already done a fantastic job. With multi-point EFI, a 10.0:1 CR, MIVEC and 24 valve heads, there's not much more left for the aftermarket tuner to do. Of course, an intake and exhaust should release a little more power (maybe 5-10%) - but that's about it. Personally, I'd also be very inclined to fit a set of road-legal semi-race tyres to a beast like this. "I'd always wondered why someone would pay 30k for a Mitsubishi FTO MIVEC V6 - especially when they can buy something like a twin turbo Zed for similar money. And those automatic FTOs? What a mishmash of pretences they must be - or, at least, that's what I'd figured... However, not long after picking up one of these Japanese-imported beasties, I had changed my opinion of them q-u-i-t-e a bit. Forget any ideas that this is merely a high-fashion boulevard cruiser - the Mitsubishi FTO MIVEC V6 is a 100% self-indulgent sportscar." said by jeremy clarkson Whats your opinion?? This post has been edited by jezza888: Jun 11 2010, 06:32 PM |
clutch-monkey
Post #4
The gpr is slightly faster is it doesnt have as much luxuries as the gpx, same engine but lightweight model. The gpr is the ultimate fto. The gpr pushes 264hp at 197kw. what? |
---|
clutch-monkey
Post #8
The gpr is a lightweight model fto 197kw look it up. yeah it says 196hp, not kw though. |
---|
45SET
Post #10
QUOTE (jezza888 @ Via PM) I thought the VTi-R DC2 was ot in 95 aswell?? i didnt see it win car of the year in japan?? lol Not one to really talk of PM... so thought I would put it back in here. Integra might not have won car of the year... But it appears the year after the FTO won (94-95) the Honda Civic actually won it (95-96). Car of the Year - Japan Go drive a few more FWD cars before you start making outrageous claims that you think the FTO is the best FWD car available. Anything from Honda with a "Type R" Badge and anything out of Europe that is known as a "Hot Hatch" would out perform it (In every way). |
---|
clutch-monkey
Post #13
Go drive a few more FWD cars before you start making outrageous claims that you think the FTO is the best FWD car available. Anything from Honda with a "Type R" Badge and anything out of Europe that is known as a "Hot Hatch" would out perform it (In every way). without the stupid smiley face back end, to boot |
---|
45SET
Post #15
Ive had a honda civic and i admit its a very reliable car at the bend but no where as near as powerful as the fto, power to weight ratio. 2L 24v V6 Compared to a 1.6L 16v I4 (I assume your Civic had a B16a in it, otherwise if it had some type of D-series, they aren't even comparable) Two totally different engines. The engine in the FTO is a good piece of kit, but it's not being used for the right application (FWD). A twin Turbo version is used in the VR4 Galant, and they are fantastic (As they are AWD) |
---|
45SET
Post #16
Ive had a honda civic and i admit its a very reliable car at the bend but no where as near as powerful as the fto, power to weight ratio. 2L 24v V6 Compared to a 1.6L 16v I4 (I assume your Civic had a B16a in it, otherwise if it had some type of D-series, they aren't even comparable) Two totally different engines. The engine in the FTO is a good piece of kit, but it's not being used for the right application (FWD). A twin Turbo version is used in the VR4 Galant, and they are fantastic (As they are AWD) |
---|
clutch-monkey
Post #19
2L 24v V6 Compared to a 1.6L 16v I4 (I assume your Civic had a B16a in it, otherwise if it had some type of D-series, they aren't even comparable) Two totally different engines. The engine in the FTO is a good piece of kit, but it's not being used for the right application (FWD). A twin Turbo version is used in the VR4 Galant, and they are fantastic (As they are AWD) not to mention the honda seems to have way more potential to unlock: In terms of tweak potential the FTO is limited. In the same way as extracting more power from a Suzuki Swift GTi engine is difficult, the 6A12 is a real stubborn thing. The problem (if you can call it that) is that the factory has already done a fantastic job. With multi-point EFI, a 10.0:1 CR, MIVEC and 24 valve heads, there's not much more left for the aftermarket tuner to do. aftermarket for these is a bitch.. i hear gearboxes are costly to replace? |
---|
iamhappy46
Post #23
The gpr is a lightweight model fto 197kw look it up. Hp not Kw. and dont sprout any Gran Turismo special edition bullshit... it was a game. |
---|
Ryan_Chandler
Post #30
https://www.boostcruising.com/forums/index....=590553&hl= |
---|
vomit
Post #33
Well it wont cost as much to put a supercharger or turbo on an fto as it would with a vr4, turbo conversion costs around $2000. mght need a gear change shift light though cause it goes fkn hard. gonna bring it down the 1/4 mile. i reckon its a 11 second car or just over Get The Fuck Out. 11 Seconds? |
---|
clutch-monkey
Post #34
https://www.boostcruising.com/forums/index....=590553&hl= started this yesterday after test driving a GPX most epic P plater car not even close |
---|
If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.
Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.
If you don't have an account create one below.
Create AccountLogin using your Facebook account!