Login
3rd October 2008 - 12:57 AM
|
caseyjohnphotography
Post #318
Damo i had the 2x mk2 and i used it at D.A this year for the 1st time and just quietly it was absolutely appalling whether it was the settings i was using but 90% of my photos were blurry even at reasonably high shutters for entry's |
|---|
I just need to get myself a 1.4x as well! I've heard a lot of negative comments about the 2x
|
|
matt mead
Post #321
I heard lots of bad things about the 2.0x tele convertor but to be honest im sold on it... yes image quility is reduced aswell as auto focus speed... but compareing that to my 350d and 55-250 i think its still better... |
|---|
|
|
caseyjohnphotography
Post #322
mmmm, from those i must admit they look rather good matt |
|---|
|
|
matt mead
Post #323
lets just say im happy about my decisions to upgrade |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
caseyjohnphotography
Post #326
With those images you posted above and normally all your images they look asif they have a sort of soft glow around the edges, not saying it looks bad but it looks good and i know its a filter |
|---|
 |
Nick_
Post #329
QUOTE(Kyl3 @ Oct 5 2008, 11:04 AM) [snapback]1282960931[/snapback] If it's a cheap shit filter it will give odd halos and things! UV filters do shit all anyway Word. Selling my 17-85 and I'm giving my Hoya UV as a freebe. Great detail, especially in the first volvo one. I rekon they're crisp as mate, any more detail and it'd take me all day to take it in. Nothing negative to say from me, and as to the halo.. I can't really say I've noticed anything, perhaps Casey is just nuts. |
|---|
|
|
matt mead
Post #331
just had a quick look through my photos and processed some shots. New Gear made it a steep learning curve, panning is alot harder with the extra weight of the 70-200 and 40d...i need more practice and my back and arms are quite sore lol... it rained in the middle of the day and i got drenched but the plastci bags worked atreat on the camera....anyway here are some teaser shot before i get a chance to go through the other 2000 shots. |
|---|
|
|
|---|
 |
bergie_318is
Post #336
wow matt i really love your style of automotive photography! every shot has its own "style" and their all so awesome! your panning skills are great! |
|---|
 |
|---|
i love all your photo's
 |
blacktrack Mal
Post #341
QUOTE(matt mead @ Oct 8 2008, 05:17 PM) [snapback]1282976253[/snapback] 21  I really like this shot. Also like some of the different crops you have in the other shots. Nice Set of pics 
|
|---|
|
|
matt mead
Post #343
While i wished i was at bathurst on the weekend, i had to settle for Oran Park lol...Thought i get some more practice in with my new gear so i went out on Saturday for some dirty drift action, no new angles as im just trying to re learn what i was doing before. But im absolutely loving the 40d and 70-200. |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Nick_
Post #347
QUOTE(caseyjohnphotography) Posted Yesterday, 08:13 PM archy sucks, and so does qr esp if your not ontrack. hot pics matt Pity that's all we got dickhead. I and more and more people think archerfield rocks, it's a small tight track so it's good for cars other than big money power machines so you see a lot more on field than the usual's and for any photog, you're instantly on track and you don't need any certification etc.. Archy win Casey loose. |
|---|
|
|
caseyjohnphotography
Post #348
yer, not like i haven't shot archy before |
|---|
|
|
matt mead
Post #350
lol, we all have to shot with what we are faced with... as much as i would luv to be able to take snaps at the best race tracks through out the world, its not going to happen so u got to make the most out of what you got unfortunetly and if u get bored of that you need to find new challenge/ angles.. |
|---|
-
Member Login
If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.
Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.
If you don't have an account create one below.
Create Account -
Login using your Facebook account!