#1
19th July 2006 - 10:37 PM
Post |
|
---|---|
Howdy all, Well here are a few of my photo's have only been doing this for about 7-8 months but due to work i really don't have a lot of time to really take photo's thus a very slow learning curve. I use a Nikon D50 some comments and critism would be very welcome. This post has been edited by Ghetto Panda: Jul 19 2006, 10:42 PM |
vp_s_wagon
Post #3
Nice camera! what lenses do u have? |
---|
vp_s_wagon
Post #7
Nice lenses! |
---|
Ghetto Panda
Post #8
Tried shooting in RAW once and when i went to view my pics they where stuipdly small, mind you i did'nt open them with Photoshop (I have Adobe Photoshop CS2) so maybe i need the software you are talking about if so then yeah i'll grab it off you for sure. |
---|
Ghetto Panda
Post #10
Yeah i'm off SD and i guessed you where Chubbs i've been looking at people's photo's over the last couple of days and noticed the TK Designs name on your pics. |
---|
vp_s_wagon
Post #11
This is the software, its just a plugin for CS2. When u preview them, just use the mode on ur camera that does JPEG and RAW so u can view the JPEG's fast and choose which RAW's u want to keep and edit etc. |
---|
Ghetto Panda
Post #13
Here are some shots from today. Finally got RAW images to load in photoshop soooo much better anyway c & c please. |
---|
vp_s_wagon
Post #16
Nice stuff man, I like. The only thing u should watch for is the placement of moving things in the frame. U should always have the path the moving object is about to go on in front of them and very little of the path from behind them. It makes it nicer to look at because they are easier for the eye to follow. I am refering to the pic of the MG btw. |
---|
Ghetto Panda
Post #17
Here's a couple more from yesterday. I like the one of my son on the floor but the light on the ground annoys me but i still think it came out alright. And the windmill was'nt taken in RAW and too me does'nt look as good. |
---|
vp_s_wagon
Post #18
i like that last one, but as u said, raw would have been better. what ISO were using? is seems quite high, my thoughts would be to have it on an ISO of 200 and f.18-f.22 so the powerlines are clearer. still good though, and easily fixable if u needed to. |
---|
Ghetto Panda
Post #20
QUOTE(vp_s_wagon @ Jul 30 2006, 12:55 PM) [snapback]1280106457[/snapback] i like that last one, but as u said, raw would have been better. what ISO were using? is seems quite high, my thoughts would be to have it on an ISO of 200 and f.18-f.22 so the powerlines are clearer. still good though, and easily fixable if u needed to. I also love the one of ur son, it has alot of movement and i like it. Yeah ISO was 800 and f/4.2 i now really not good settings but i was walking home after taking those construction shots and just quickly took the pic as i was actually standing in the middle of the road pretty much and it's a pretty damn busy road so took it qiuckly did'nt even bother changing the settings my bad |
---|
BOOSTMEISTER
Post #21
Loving the tap mate, great colour and contrast is just right. Looking forward to more in the future. |
---|
vp_s_wagon
Post #22
QUOTE(Ghetto Panda @ Jul 30 2006, 11:19 AM) [snapback]1280106491[/snapback] Yeah ISO was 800 and f/4.2 i now really not good settings but i was walking home after taking those construction shots and just quickly took the pic as i was actually standing in the middle of the road pretty much and it's a pretty damn busy road so took it qiuckly did'nt even bother changing the settings my bad Yeh i feel that! It always used to happen to me, now i just leave it on apature priority ('A') and leave the ISO at 200 all the time so i just turn the wheel to chose an apature, point and shoot! |
---|
Ghetto Panda
Post #23
Here's two i took today the first one is my crazy budgie Happy, he is totally nuts. And yes another pic of my boy |
---|
Ghetto Panda
Post #25
My son is 5 and growing up way to damn fast, it's funny you say he looks like a cocktiel because he refuses to eat budgie food only cockatiel food |
---|
Ghetto Panda
Post #27
Just a couple of shots i took tonight the highway pics really did'nt turn out how i wanted them but the tree pic came up better than i expected it too. c&c as usual. |
---|
vp_s_wagon
Post #33
QUOTE(DR1F7 @ Aug 1 2006, 09:23 PM) [snapback]1280114185[/snapback] Then you need to open the appeture then Nice exposures man I like the first highway one, how long were the exposures? U mean close the aperture! U wanna set ur camera at ISO 100-200, or as low as it goes. Get a tripod, set the exposure to about 5-30secs set ur aperture at about f.16 or higher, no higher than about f.28, point and shoot (use a remote or self timer so u dont shake the camera when u press the button). They are pretty easy to do. Ghetto Panda, Just be careful of overlooking the actual composition of the photo when doing them, dont just concentrate on getting the lights in, make sure the rest of the pic is good too. I found the best place to get interesting ones it from high vantage points over busy roads. I know my first set were cool coz of the lights but they were actually shit photos except for one! Yours are better than mine but they could still do with some work. Cheers Harry edit: dont know what ur on about BigShot!! |
---|
Ghetto Panda
Post #35
Here a some i took a couple of hours a go. |
---|
If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.
Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.
If you don't have an account create one below.
Create AccountLogin using your Facebook account!